“Yes, books are dangerous. They should be dangerous – they contain ideas.” ― Pete Hautman

“Yes, books are dangerous. They should be dangerous – they contain ideas.” ― Pete Hautman

It’s Banned Book week . . .

w41_80430015

With so much discussion around the ideas of micro-aggressions and trigger warnings, I’m pretty sure Socrates is rolling over in his grave. His idea of a robust conversation to strengthen the mind and the spirit is under attack right now which means the academy as we know it is under threat. I’m not sure how to stay effective in the classroom if I can’t ask hard questions and expose my students to difficult materials. We only grow as people if we have to, because after all, ignorance is bliss.

The Atlantic recently published a great article titled “The Coddling of the American Mind”. It offered fantastic insights about the un-education process we are currently facilitating in American schools. Let’s hope we start charging less for that!

I can see and feel the rising anxiety on my campus and in my classroom as young people expect second chances on tests and quizzes or challenge my data when it disagrees with their opinion. I am surprised and a bit nervous when they show up to class in their jammy-pants cradling their Sponge Bob dolls. It might be a fashion statement but it is certainly incongruent with the goals they stated in their first week on campus – the desire to get a good job that pays well.

There is a lot of buzz in Higher Ed about stackable credentials – adding industry specific certificates to bolster academic degrees for true work-force readiness. This is usually discussed as an add-on to a two-year Associate’s Degree, but perhaps we need to add a counseling certificate as a requirement to all faculty posts?

The following is a list of anxieties that can get “triggered” in the everyday life of today’s increasingly anxious youth. Described as “mental filtering”, these common cognitive distortions are playing havoc on today’s college campuses. Read at your own peril.

A partial list from Robert L. Leahy, Stephen J. F. Holland, and Lata K. McGinn’s Treatment Plans and Interventions for Depression and Anxiety Disorders (2012).

  1. Mind reading. You assume that you know what people think without having sufficient evidence of their thoughts. “He thinks I’m a loser.”
  2. Fortune-telling. You predict the future negatively: things will get worse, or there is danger ahead. “I’ll fail that exam,” or “I won’t get the job.”
  3. Catastrophizing. You believe that what has happened or will happen will be so awful and unbearable that you won’t be able to stand it. “It would be terrible if I failed.”
  4. Labeling. You assign global negative traits to yourself and others. “I’m undesirable,” or “He’s a rotten person.”
  5. Discounting positives. You claim that the positive things you or others do are trivial. “That’s what wives are supposed to do—so it doesn’t count when she’s nice to me,” or “Those successes were easy, so they don’t matter.”
  6. Negative filtering. You focus almost exclusively on the negatives and seldom notice the positives. “Look at all of the people who don’t like me.”
  7. Overgeneralizing. You perceive a global pattern of negatives on the basis of a single incident. “This generally happens to me. I seem to fail at a lot of things.”
  8. Dichotomous thinking. You view events or people in all-or-nothing terms. “I get rejected by everyone,” or “It was a complete waste of time.”
  9. Blaming. You focus on the other person as the source of your negative feelings, and you refuse to take responsibility for changing yourself. “She’s to blame for the way I feel now,” or “My parents caused all my problems.”
  10. What if? You keep asking a series of questions about “what if” something happens, and you fail to be satisfied with any of the answers. “Yeah, but what if I get anxious?” or “What if I can’t catch my breath?”
  11. Emotional reasoning. You let your feelings guide your interpretation of reality. “I feel depressed; therefore, my marriage is not working out.”
  12. Inability to disconfirm. You reject any evidence or arguments that might contradict your negative thoughts. For example, when you have the thought I’m unlovable, you reject as irrelevant any evidence that people like you. Consequently, your thought cannot be refuted. “That’s not the real issue. There are deeper problems. There are other factors.”
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s